🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive move to prohibit social media access for young people below 16 is sending ripples internationally. Officials, campaigners, and guardians are monitoring with great interest to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

The European Movement

In Europe, a rising number of countries are moving toward similar measures.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the leader arguing that mobile devices and apps are "taking away our children's innocence". Legislation may be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to shield young people from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is developing a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media users. The media minister have suggested that an similar ban remains "a potential measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has called on the legislature to pass a proposal lifting the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a similar action, including an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has urged parents to prevent their youngsters from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has adopted a advisory resolution demanding a ban for minors without parental consent is provided. While it warns of the "addictive" quality of these services, the resolution does not create enforceable legislation.

"A clear age restriction is a good foundation," commented a leading European lawmaker driving the measure.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Eye

Across Britain, the leadership has not ruled out a future ban, stating that "no option is being dismissed" but stressing any policy must be "grounded in robust research".

Last year, momentum built behind a legislative effort to enact controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately modified. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to investigate the topic.

Campaign organizations have expressed apprehensions. An organization set up by the family of a girl who took her own life after encountering disturbing online content suggests that a strict age ban might not improve online safety and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of risk when users reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to build platforms and apps that are safe and fit for children," commented a prominent child protection advocate.

The United States: A Decentralized Picture

Stateside, legislation is mostly occurring at the regional government level amid federal gridlock.

• Utah mandates adult approval for minors to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• The state of Florida has passed a law barring under-14s from joining social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has passed a rule restricting teenagers to a single hour of social media use per day, with any further time dependent on parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced measures demanding parental consent for minors to set up social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from some individuals to follow the Australian path, a US-wide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

International Perspectives

Apart from these regions, additional nations are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, global agencies adopt a more measured tone. Unicef has advised that age-based restrictions have downsides and "could have unintended consequences". The body notes that social networks can be a "vital connection" for isolated children and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to prioritize child safeguards.

As this international debate unfolds, the actions of this nation and several other countries indicate that states globally are no longer prepared to wait for platforms to make changes on their own.